Comments on: What makes a winning Web 2.0 website? http://www.arikfr.com/blog/web20-what-makes-it-tick.html From the desk of a Software Developer Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:39:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: arik http://www.arikfr.com/blog/web20-what-makes-it-tick.html/comment-page-1#comment-4 arik Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:10:43 +0000 http://www.arikfr.com/blog/web20-what-makes-it-tick.html#comment-4 I did answer. What makes a successful Web 2.0 site isn't the site, but the <strong>PEOPLE</strong> behind it (which reflects to the site). And a good insight a friend of mine shared with me lately - it's not only the people that make the product (the entrepreneurs), but also the VC company that brings its experience and wisdom (if it brings). <em>- Arik </em> I did answer. What makes a successful Web 2.0 site isn’t the site, but the PEOPLE behind it (which reflects to the site).

And a good insight a friend of mine shared with me lately – it’s not only the people that make the product (the entrepreneurs), but also the VC company that brings its experience and wisdom (if it brings).

- Arik

]]> By: lior http://www.arikfr.com/blog/web20-what-makes-it-tick.html/comment-page-1#comment-3 lior Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:05:17 +0000 http://www.arikfr.com/blog/web20-what-makes-it-tick.html#comment-3 Hey Arik, I think I understood why you think youtube made it big time, but you started great talking about all those fetures that define web 2.0 but do not define succes in web 2.0 sites. So you didn't answer the question as far as I understood, what makes a web 2.0 site succed? Hey Arik,
I think I understood why you think youtube made it big time, but you started great talking about all those fetures that define web 2.0 but do not define succes in web 2.0 sites.
So you didn’t answer the question as far as I understood, what makes a web 2.0 site succed?

]]>