<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obvious Ideas &#187; Ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arikfr.com/blog/category/ideas/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arikfr.com/blog</link>
	<description>From the desk of a Software Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>THE Business Model For StackExchange</title>
		<link>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/the-business-model-for-stackexchange.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/the-business-model-for-stackexchange.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 06:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bounty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ServerFault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StackExchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StackOverflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arikfr.com/blog/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like that Jeff &#38; Joel gave up on finding a viable business model and just went after the VC money. I get that. But what I don&#8217;t get is why they have&#8217;t tried a very simple, but in &#8230; <a href="http://www.arikfr.com/blog/the-business-model-for-stackexchange.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Announcing the Stack Overflow Series A Financing" href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/05/announcing-our-series-a/">It looks like that Jeff &amp; Joel gave up on finding a viable business model and just went after the VC money</a>. I get that. But what I don&#8217;t get is why they have&#8217;t tried a very simple, but in my opinion good business model &#8211; <em>let people pay for answers</em>?</p>
<p>One of my clients is having connection problems between their application servers and the database servers. It looks like some TCP configuration issue, but I&#8217;m no expert in that so after trying to figure it out by my own, I posted a question on <a href="http://www.serverfault.com/">ServerFault</a>. The question got only one answer which wasn&#8217;t that helpful.</p>
<p>Now my next step is to hire someone on <a href="http://www.odesk.com">ODesk</a> to solve the problem. But what if I could just pay for someone to answer my question on ServerFault? For me that would be perfect, because that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m going to do anyway with the freelancer I find on ODesk, as I can&#8217;t trust him enough to give him access to the client servers.</p>
<p>I know there is a <a href="http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/01/reputation-bounty-for-unanswered-questions/">bounty feature on StackOverflow</a>, where you can give someone some of your reputation (points) on StackOverflow if they answer the question. But the thing is &#8211; I&#8217;m not that active on ServerFault and don&#8217;t have enough reputation.</p>
<p>Maybe I should just create this marketplace, where valued users can offer paid answers and people can hire them. That might work, but after seeing what happened with the Twitter ecosystem I learned my lesson &#8211; no more filling holes for OTHERs. Because it is obvious that if my marketplace works, the StackExchange team will be motivated to create their own version.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://danpeguine.com/">Dan</a> (who is too cool to comment) sent in his thoughts by email:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google answers failed and it was a paid system. The main problem is the subjectivity of the quality of the answer. How do you judge that?</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a great point. I think that it will be basically the same as it is today with point bounties:</p>
<p>1. Once you put a bounty you already give in the points (or in my case &#8211; the money), so you have no incentive to &#8220;lie&#8221; and say that the answer you got isn&#8217;t good enough just to save yourself the payment.</p>
<p>2. You decide which answer is &#8220;the&#8221; answer and gets money.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t get a good answer, you can always keep it around or raise the bid.</p>
<p>Another concern someone might raise is the same that Joel &amp; Jeff usually raise &#8211; what&#8217;s a good price for an answer? While many people don&#8217;t mind sharing knowledge for free, once you start attaching a price tag it becomes a whole different story. Well, I acknowledge that and I don&#8217;t think that the whole StackOverflow site should be paid, but it should have a paid option.</p>
<p>People will still have a great incentive to answer questions just like today (they increase their reputation), but this will give another option for those who ask more esoteric questions.</p>
<p><em>Now, what do you think?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/the-business-model-for-stackexchange.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten ideas about ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/ten-ideas-about-ideas.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/ten-ideas-about-ideas.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mastermind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arikfr.com/blog/ten-ideas-about-ideas.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If after reading the welcome post you still don&#8217;t understand what I want from you &#8211; I don&#8217;t blame you. It was a bit obscure. I think what describes best my motivation behind starting a blog about my ideas (instead &#8230; <a href="http://www.arikfr.com/blog/ten-ideas-about-ideas.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If after reading the welcome post you still don&#8217;t understand what I want from you &#8211; I don&#8217;t blame you. It was a bit obscure. I think what describes best my motivation behind starting a blog about my ideas (instead of keeping them to my self) is <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000119" title="Ten ideas about ideas">this blog post</a> by Doc Searl. He precisely explains why it&#8217;s better sharing ideas instead of keeping ideas.</p>
<p>What I actually want is -</p>
<ol>
<li>Creating a &#8220;virtual mastermind&#8221; (you can read more about mastermind <a href="http://blog.opherbrayer.com/mastermind-group-a-must-for-everyone.html" title="Blog post by Opher Brayer on Mastermind">here</a>).</li>
<li>Seeing the ideas I will post become into reality by some talented developers out there in the big universe.</li>
</ol>
<p>I hope to reach this two goals with <strike>this blog</strike> your help. <img src='http://www.arikfr.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So stay tuned &#8211; it&#8217;s going to be <strong>fun</strong>,</p>
<p><strong><em>Arik</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/ten-ideas-about-ideas.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obvious ideas?</title>
		<link>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/obvious-ideas.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/obvious-ideas.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arikfr.com/blog/obvious-ideas.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From time to time I&#8217;ve an idea to a new software, website, mashup or something between them. I call this ideas &#8220;obvious ideas&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s something so obvious , that you don&#8217;t understand how no one taught of it before &#8230; <a href="http://www.arikfr.com/blog/obvious-ideas.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From time to time I&#8217;ve an idea to a new software, website, mashup or something between them. I call this ideas &#8220;obvious ideas&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s something so obvious , that you don&#8217;t understand how no one taught of it before you. Because I&#8217;m extremely busy (1 day job, 2 startups I&#8217;m involved in, 2 blogs and a girlfriend), most of the ideas I just write on a sticky note and add it to my collection of good-unused ideas.</p>
<p><strong>Well &#8211; no more!</strong> I decided to share the world (you) with this ideas, in a hope that one of you will pick it up, and do something with it.</p>
<p><span id="more-4"></span><br />
On the next days I will post some the latest ideas I had.<br />
If anyone of you has an idea of his own that he wants to share &#8211; email me, comment here or anything else, and I will post it here. You can also write a post about it on your own blog, and I will just put a link to it.</p>
<p>Those of you who read Hebrew are welcomed to read <a href="http://www.arikfr.com/wpheb/" title="Arik's Heberw Blog">my Hebrew blog</a>.<br />
<strong><em>Arik </em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arikfr.com/blog/obvious-ideas.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

